Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1975No. 73-921PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill-, C. J.

Under Ohio’s workmen’s compensation law, an allegation in a claim for death benefits that a workman died as the direct result of an industrial injury is insufficient to vest the Administrator of the Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation with jurisdiction to determine the claim. E. C. 4123.59 establishes three separate and alternative jurisdictional prerequisites to the consideration of such a claim: (1) The death must have occurred within three years of the injury; or (2) the workman must have *122received total or partial disability compensation for the injury during any portion of the year preceding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Menefee v. Queen City MetroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Beatty v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API