Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Behm

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 1, 2010No. SC07-661PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles Behm has been a lawyer in this state since 1999. He is currently suspended from the practice of law as a result of professional misconduct in another Bar discipline case. 1 The referee in this case recommends that Behm be found guilty of professional misconduct related to trust account violations and failure to file income tax returns since the time he became a lawyer. 2

As a lawyer admitted to the practice of law by this Court, Behm earned money from the practice of law. Behm asserts, however, that he is not required to pay federal income taxes because “his time was his life capital…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Florida Bar v. GwynnSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. & SC13-2480 The Florida Bar v. Jeffrey Alan NorkinSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  3. The Florida Bar v. Susan K. W. ErlenbachSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  4. Florida Board of Bar Examiners re B.U.U.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  5. The Florida Bar v. Cyrus A. BischoffSupreme Court of Florida · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API