Legal Opinion

Eisner v. MacOmber

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 8, 1920No. 318PublishedCited by 1,247 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

252 U.S. 189 (1920)

EISNER, AS COLLECTOR OF UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

v.

MACOMBER.

No. 318.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 16, 1919.

Reargument May 19, 1919.

Reargued October 17, 20, 1919.

Decided March 8, 1920.

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Charles E. Hughes, with whom Mr. George Welwood Murray was on the briefs, for defendant in error.

Mr. George W. Wickersham and Mr. Charles Robinson Smith, by leave of court,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Pitney; Dissent · Holmes; Dissent · Brandeis.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  5. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,247 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

1,242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API