Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Gwynn

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 16, 2012No. SC08-622PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that respondent be found guilty of professional misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons more fully explained below, we approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations as to guilt, but we disapprove the recommended discipline, and instead impose a ninety-one-day suspension.

FACTS

On April 1, 2008, The Florida Bar filed a four-count complaint against respondent, Mary Alice Gwynn, alleging various instances of misconduct relating to her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. The Florida Bar v. GermainSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. The Florida Bar v. TobkinSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  5. The Florida Bar v. CommitteSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Erwin RosenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Florida Bar v. CommitteSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  3. The Florida Bar v. Madsen Marcellus, Jr.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. The Florida Bar v. Cyrus A. BischoffSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  5. Florida Bar v. TroppSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API