Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Susan K. W. Erlenbach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 1, 2014No. SC10-1793PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review an uncontested referee’s report recommending that Susan K.W. Erlenbach be found guilty of professional misconduct and suspended for eighty-nine days, followed by a two-year period of probation. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. After considering the parties’ responses to our order to show cause,1 we approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations of guilt. We disapprove the recommended sanction and, instead, impose a one-year suspension, followed by a two-year period of probation.

FACTS

The Florida Bar filed a complaint alleging that Respondent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. The Florida Bar v. Del PinoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amended January 30, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API