The Florida Bar v. Susan K. W. Erlenbach
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review an uncontested referee’s report recommending that Susan K.W. Erlenbach be found guilty of professional misconduct and suspended for eighty-nine days, followed by a two-year period of probation. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. After considering the parties’ responses to our order to show cause,1 we approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations of guilt. We disapprove the recommended sanction and, instead, impose a one-year suspension, followed by a two-year period of probation.
FACTS
The Florida Bar filed a complaint alleging that Respondent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- The Florida Bar v. Del PinoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amended January 30, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2016