Legal Opinion
The Sultana
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1948No. 2194PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Libelant prays that process may issue against the steamer Sultana, her engines, etc., and that all persons having or claiming to have any interest therein be cited to appear and answer and that process, with clause of foreign attachment, may issue against respondent Browning Steamship Company citing it to appear and answer; that if said respondent cannot be found within this district, then that all goods and particularly credits or monies belonging to it and now on deposit with the copartnership of Boland & Cornelius, Buffalo, N. Y., in the amount of $115,000 may be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- June v. George C. Peterson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
- Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Orange County Theatres, Inc. v. LevyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Matchen v. McGaheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Kingsley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.