Legal Opinion

Dickheiser v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1945No. Civ. A. No. 4685PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

There are five motions before the Court: (1) complainants’ motion to amend the complaint, (2) complainants’ motion to compel production of documents, (3) complainants’ motion to strike defendants’ affidavits, (4) motion of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and certain individual defendants for summary judgment in their favor, (5) motion of the Pennroad Corporation to dismiss the action. The motions were argued before the Court at the same time and will be disposed of seriatim in this opinion.

This action, brought by stockholders of Pennsylvania Railroad is one of three…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  4. United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Humphrys v. JarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Wanda R. Lee v. The National Life Assurance Company of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. The SultanaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1948
  4. Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  5. Lauchert v. American S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API