Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.

HINCKS, District Judge.

Paragraph 1(a) to (e), inclusive, and also Paragraph 1(g) is granted. The plaintiff’s only opposition is confined to books, etc., covering the period prior to January 1, 1936. But since the plaintiff is claiming damages and loss of profits for the subsequent period, data showing its commercial results for the prior period is relevant and material as constituting the base upon which the claimed subsequent loss may be computed.

By Paragraph 1(f) of the motion, the defendant seeks inspection of duplicates of plaintiff’s income tax returns for the years 1934 to 1938. The…