Legal Opinion

Wells v. Young

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2002No. 00-832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 M. Duane Young and Nancy Young (“the Youngs”) appeal from the July 25, 2000, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of the Montana Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Big Horn County, permanently enjoining flood irrigation practices on their property. Additionally, the Youngs appeal from the District Court’s October 4, 2000, Order denying their Rule 59(g), M.R.Civ.P., motion to alter or amend the judgment. We reverse.

¶2 We find one issue dispositive of this appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it permanently enjoined lawful flood irrigation practices on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ducham v. TumaMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Engel v. GamppMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nelson v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Butler v. GermannMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Madison Fork Ranch v. L & B Lodge Pole Timber ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shammel v. Canyon Resources Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Tally Bissell Neighbors, Inc. v. Eyrie Shotgun Ranch, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Tally Bissell Neigh. v. Eyrie Shotgun RanchMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wells v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API