Legal Opinion

Butler v. Germann

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. 91-072PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Owen and Ema Butler sought an injunction requiring John and Barbara Germann to repair damage to an irrigation ditch that runs through the Germanns’ property before delivering water to the Butler’s property. The District Court for the Fourth Judicial District in Ravalli County issued a preliminary injunction and, after a hearing, issued a permanent injunction, together with an award of damages, costs, and attorney’s fees. The Germanns appeal. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Did the District Court err in ordering the Germanns to repair the ditch?

*1092. Did the District Court err in permanently enjoining…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Billings Clinic v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Frame v. FrameMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Shammel v. Canyon Resources Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Maloney v. Home and Investment Center, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API