Legal Opinion

Engel v. Gampp

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2000No. 98-107PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Eric C. Gampp and Paula Lammers Gampp (Gampps) appeal from the judgment of the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, awarding attorney fees to Celeste G. Engel (Engel) as the prevailing party. Engel cross-appeals, claiming the District Court erred in determining the scope of the injunction which it ordered in her favor.

¶2 We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

¶3 We address the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in concluding that Engel was the prevailing party, pursuant to § 70-17-112(5), MCA?

2. Did the District Court grant Engel an injunction too…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rieman v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ducham v. TumaMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Laden v. AtkesonMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Boylan v. Van DykeMontana Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shammel v. Canyon Resources Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API