Legal Opinion

State v. Hockersmith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 2002No. C9901-30076; A109646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to enter a judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance. He filed a petition to enter a pretrial drug treatment program, which would have entitled him to dismissal of the charge with prejudice upon successful completion of the treatment program. The petition recited that, if he failed to complete the treatment program, defendant agreed to proceed to trial “based…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. WillyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. ParagonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. In re the Marriage of McDuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API