State v. Lusk

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for, among other offenses, giving false information to a peace officer for service of an arrest warrant, ORS 162.385(l)(b).1 In a single assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred when it failed to enter a judgment of acquittal on that charge, Count 2. Defendant contends that, because the evidence was insufficient to allow a rational trier of fact to find that the officer asked for defendant’s identification for the purpose of arresting him on a warrant, as required for a conviction under ORS 162.385(l)(b), the trial court erred…