State v. Paragon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendants were convicted after a jury trial of two counts of criminal neglect in the second degree, ORS 163.545, a Class A misdemeanor. On appeal, they challenge one of the convictions, contending that the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to establish the elements of the offense. We conclude that the evidence was insufficient and reverse the conviction.
Our standard for reviewing the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, any rational…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DahlOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. GoffOregon Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. BistrikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. DrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. DerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.