Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railway Co. v. Hanning

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1892No. 15,750PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment recovered by the appellee for the alleged negligent killing of-her decedent, Henry A. Hanning, who was a car repairer, employed by the appellant in its repair shops at Hunting-burg.

The appellant insists that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the paragraph of complaint on which the case was tried.

Omitting prefatory averments, the complaint avers that, “ In repairing defendant’s cars, it was necessary for the person employed to do the same to work on top of, and around, and under said cars, and that to enable said employees, including plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Taylor v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WhitcombIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. LangIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fitter v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. New Castle Bridge Co. v. DotyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MuggIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Oölitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HolcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API