Legal Opinion

Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Holcomb

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1894No. 1,011PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellant, by his complaint in three paragraphs, sought to recover damages for injuries received by him while working for appellant as a car repairer.

The complaint charges that appellant carelessly failed to adopt, use, and enforce proper signals or other means *199for the protection of the men engaged at work on its repair tracks, which was unknown to appellee, and that appellant carelessly and negligently permitted and caused one of its engines to run against cars upon the repair track, whereby appellee was injured while working thereon. ■

It is further charged in some of the paragraphs,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Gatzweiler v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WitteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Hermann v. Port Blakely Mill Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1896
  5. New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API