Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Lang

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1889No. 12,543PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The material allegations of the appellee’s complaint are these : That her intestate, Jacob Lang, was in the service of the appellant as a section hand on the 14th day of December, 1884, and had then been in its service for twelve months; that the foreman under whom he worked was Nicholas Lang; that on Sunday, the 14th day of December, 1884, the appellant directed its section foreman, Nicholas Lang, to take his crew of hands and repair a part of its track not far from the town of Weisburg, and that, pursuant to the order, the foreman caused his crew, of which the deceased was one, to get upon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Booth v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Taylor v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CorpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API