Legal Opinion
Miller v. Hoagland
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1966No. Civ. 671PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
Two days before the trial court announced its decision in the case of City of Bakersfield v. Miller (Kern County No. 81886, the judgment in which was later affirmed by the Supreme Court—City of Bakersfield v. Miller, 64 Cal.2d 93 [48 Cal.Rptr. 889, 410 P.2d 393]), the defendant herein, Kenneth W. Hoagland, City Attorney of Bakersfield, and one of its attorneys of record in that case, wrote a letter in the nature of an informal brief to the Honorable John Locke, Judge of the Superior Court of Tulare County, who had been assigned to try the case by the Chairman of the Judicial Council. A copy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Bakersfield v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Irvine v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Tietz v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1976
- Willy H. Willis v. Thomas B. ReddinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Taylor v. MitzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.