Taylor v. Mitzel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, J.
In this action plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining defendants’ general demurrers to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, without leave to amend.
This complaint alleged three causes of action. First, a conspiracy was asserted among defendants to deprive plaintiff Andrew Martin Taylor (Taylor) of his federal civil rights (consisting of entitlement to Medi-Cal services). Second, intentional injuries were alleged to the hearts and nervous systems of Taylor’s mother and aunt, Mary Taylor and Catherine Hutek, respectively. These injuries…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Espinoza v. O'DELLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Briggs v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.