Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Mitzel

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1978No. Civ. 17120PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REGAN, J.

In this action plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining defendants’ general demurrers to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, without leave to amend.

This complaint alleged three causes of action. First, a conspiracy was asserted among defendants to deprive plaintiff Andrew Martin Taylor (Taylor) of his federal civil rights (consisting of entitlement to Medi-Cal services). Second, intentional injuries were alleged to the hearts and nervous systems of Taylor’s mother and aunt, Mary Taylor and Catherine Hutek, respectively. These injuries…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Espinoza v. O'DELLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Briggs v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API