Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel Congregation
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLANDER, Judge.
We must decide whether the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act permits recovery of attorney’s fees incurred in connection with a suit instituted to confirm and enforce an arbitration award, necessitated by a refusal to comply with binding arbitration. We must also determine whether the circuit court abused its discretion in declining to impose sanctions, pursuant to Maryland Rule 1-341.
Rabbi Marcel Blitz, appellant, and the Beth Isaac Adas Israel Congregation (“Beth Isaac” or “the Synagogue”), appel-lee, negotiated a binding arbitration agreement to resolve a dispute based on…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Condon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Green v. BrooksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Driver v. SI CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Thomas v. Capital Medical Management Associates, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.