Legal Opinion
Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel Congregation
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 14, 1998No. 72, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
The question we are asked to answer in this case is whether, pursuant to Maryland Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol.), § 3-228(b) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, the Maryland Uniform Arbitration Act (the “Act”), the prevailing party in a binding arbitration proceeding may recover reasonable attorneys’ fees when the losing party’s unjustified refusal to comply with the award requires the prevailing party to institute and successfully prosecute an action in order to confirm and enforce the arbitration award.
Rabbi Marcel Blitz (“the petitioner”) and the Beth Isaac Adas…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Collier v. MD-Individual Practice Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Meshel v. Ohev Sholom Talmud TorahDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.