Legal Opinion

Driver v. SI CORP.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2003No. 28258, 28921PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a district court judgment confirming an arbitration award. The dispute arises from claims made against an escrow fund used in the sale of a company owned by Arthur and Constance Driver (Drivers) called BonTerra America, Inc. (BonTerra) to SI Corporation (SI), formerly known as Synthetic Industries, Inc.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Arthur Driver, through BonTerra, developed and marketed erosion control products made primarily from biodegradable plastics. BonTerra owned a manufacturing plant in Genesee, Idaho. SI is a Delaware corporation and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bingham County Commission v. Interstate Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Phoenix Mailers Union Local 752, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Farber v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Barbee v. WMA Securities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State Department of Health & Welfare v. HudelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API