Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Nebraska Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 13, 1931No. 28,256PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
This is an action brought by plaintiffs to recover the amount paid by them in settlement of two personal injury actions and for attor neys’ fees necessarily paid in said litigation, the defendant having refused and failed to defend therein. Plaintiffs had a verdict for $4,062, which. included $875 for attorneys’ fees and $187 interest. Defendant had made a motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence.
Plaintiffs, a partnership, used six motor trucks in their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Chapin v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- McKenna v. International Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Fletcher v. German-American Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Minnesota Electric Distributing Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rudco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Sargent v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Baker v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.