Legal Opinion
Baker v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinmah, J.
The complaint alleged and the trial court found in substance that the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $250 and costs against Edwin S. Friedman and Lawrence D. Friedman of Springfield, Massachusetts, for damages for personal injuries sustained on April 18th, 1932, in Hartford, by reason of negligent operation of a motor vehicle owned by Lawrence and driven by Edwin, liability for which was insured against under a policy issued by the present defendant. The defendant alleged as a special defense that the condition of the policy regarding notice to the insurer of accident covered by it was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Melcher v. . Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Haas Tobacco Co. v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Depot Cafe Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Arrowood Indem. Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Miller v. ZURICH GEN. ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY INS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- City of West Haven v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.