Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Morris

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1935No. Civ. 10475PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $5,000 after a trial before a jury.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff {Ah Gett v. Carr, 3 Cal. App. 47, 48 [84 Pac. 458]), the facts in the instant case are:

Plaintiff while traveling in a westerly direction on Telegraph Road, a highway which runs east and west, stopped his ear on the north half of the highway for the purpose of repairing his windshield wiper, it having rained shortly before. An automobile owned by defendant, Paul Morris, was being driven by his codefendant, Lena Morris,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Poncino v. Reid-Murdock & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Bagwill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Ah Gett v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dalley v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. LaPorte v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Powell v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Everest v. RieckenWashington Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API