LaPorte v. Houston
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
This appeal was taken by plaintiff from a judgment based on a verdict in favor of defendants in an action for damages for personal injuries. There is no substantial conflict as to any material fact, and no claim is made that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. It is contended, however, that the court erred in failing to give a requested instruction on, res ipsa loquitur. We are of the opinion that the doctrine was not applicable to the facts of this case, and that the judgment should be affirmed.
Plaintiff drove his automobile to the garage of defendant Houston for a carburetor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Honea v. City Dairy, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Tucker v. LombardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.