Legal Opinion

Murray Tool & Supply Co. v. Bridgeport MacHine Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1933No. 21356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

The Bridgeport Machine Company filed an action in the district court of Hughes county, Okla., against Anderson & Hill, a copartnership, Johnson & Ashe, a copartnership, and Murray Tool & Supply Company, seeking a personal judgment against the defendants, to foreclose a ma-terialman’s lien upon an oil and gas mining lease and the personal property thereon, and for other relief. The plaintiff dismissed as to Anderson & Hill, a copartnership, at the trial of the case. A personal judgment was rendered ip favor of the plaintiff against the defendants Johnson & Ashe and Murray Tool & Supply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christy v. Union Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. National Union Oil & Gas Co. v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Josey Oil Co. v. LeddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. McAnally v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Thacher v. International Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Conley Drilling Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Holloman v. BrittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API