Legal Opinion

Conley Drilling Co. v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 5, 1943No. 30453PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by M. L. Rogers, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Conley Drilling Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, and H. N. Conley to recover a money judgment and to foreclose a materialman’s lien upon an oil and gas mining leasehold estate for the development of which plaintiff had furnished certain tools and equipment which had been used in developing said leasehold estate for oil and gas mining purposes. A number of lien claimants intervened in the action, including Dowell Inc., hereinafter referred to as intervener, which by petition sought a money…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stinchcomb v. PattesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. McKay v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. White v. A. C. Houston Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. City of Seminole v. MooringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Gillespie v. ShufflinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mainord v. SharpCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Gilroy v. White Eagle Oil Co. Alberton Corp. v. White Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Fenstermacher v. WoodardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API