Peterman v. Schpelman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action, order denying motion of plaintiff for examination of defendant for the purpose of identifying one or more other proper defendants, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Assuming that the pertinent provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (§ 870 et seq.) precluded examination before commencement of the action for a purpose other than perpetuating testimony (contra Matter of Weil, 25 App. Div. 173), present section 295 of the Civil Practice Act…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lauffer v. Easter Star TempleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Kenerson v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Perez v. New York City HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Silverman v. NachwalterNew York Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.