Legal Opinion

Peterman v. Schpelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1948PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action, order denying motion of plaintiff for examination of defendant for the purpose of identifying one or more other proper defendants, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Assuming that the pertinent provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure (§ 870 et seq.) precluded examination before commencement of the action for a purpose other than perpetuating testimony (contra Matter of Weil, 25 App. Div. 173), present section 295 of the Civil Practice Act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lauffer v. Easter Star TempleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. In re WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kenerson v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. In re RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Perez v. New York City HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Silverman v. NachwalterNew York Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API