In re Roland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtValehte, J.
Pursuant to section 295 of the Civil Practice Act, an examination of witnesses before trial was ordered for the purpose of framing a complaint and identifying parties connected with the sale of certain stock. Petitioner averred that he had been engaged to procure a purchaser for the controlling shares'of stock of a bank, that he did procure such a purchaser and had been informed that such person, or an entity controlled by him, purchased the stock on terms satisfactory to petitioner’s principal. However, petitioner claimed that he was unable to frame a complaint or name the parties against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. Hanna Furnace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Lauffer v. Easter Star TempleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Peterman v. SchpelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Kenerson v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Barrett v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
- Striegel v. TofanoNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- In re DackNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Urban v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.