Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Fotomat Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall E. Livingston, J.

This is a motion for a protective order against an ex parte order granted by me directing Fotomat Corporation (Fotomat) to appear and submit to an examination under oath so as to furnish the names and addresses of its franchisees and lessors in New York State, or in the alternative to furnish a verified list of the same people.

In making its application for the ex parte order under CPLR 3102 (subd. [c]), plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) relied on the affidavit of its attorney setting forth certain exhibits and photographs depicting alleged improper use of Kodak’s trade-marks,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauffer v. Easter Star TempleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. In re C. J. Schellings & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. East v. Endicott Forging & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. In re CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Silverman v. NachwalterNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barrett v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
  2. In re DackNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hoffman v. BatridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API