Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1992No. 201PA90PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from defendant’s convictions for second-degree rape in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-27.3 and sexual activity by a substitute parent in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-27.7. The trial court admitted evidence that the prosecuting witness suffered a conversion reaction and post-traumatic stress disorder following an alleged rape by her stepfather. We conclude that the admission of evidence on these two psychological phenomena constitutes error where offered for the substantive purpose of proving that the rape did in fact occur. Accordingly, we reverse the decision…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API