Legal Opinion

State v. Alberico

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1993No. Nos. 20282, 20357PublishedCited by 197 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

In this opinion, we address the subject of the admissibility of expert opinion testimony regarding alleged victims of sexual abuse who suffer from post traumatic stress disorder. As a necessary sub-issue, we must also discuss in general the admissibility of scientific evidence by way of expert opinion testimony under our Rules of Evidence.

For almost three-quarters of a century, the admissibility of expert opinion testimony in American jurisprudence has been governed largely by the rule set out in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and that has been the…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by197 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999

192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API