Legal Opinion

Estrada v. Orwitz

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1946No. Civ. 13048PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant is a dentist. Plaintiff was his patient. On May 25, 1944, defendant extracted six of plaintiff’s teeth. Plaintiff brought this action for the wrongful, unauthorized, and improper extraction of five of these teeth. The jury brought in a verdict of $4,000 for plaintiff, and from the judgment entered on the verdict defendant appeals.

The defendant makes no claim that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment, but he urges that certain evidence was erroneously admitted and certain instructions erroneously given for the asserted reason that the evidence and instructions dealt…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Stanhope v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Thor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API