United States v. Lindsay
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
JONES, Senior Judge:
We are confronted in this case with the question of whether lying to a criminal investigator about a subject of official in*551vestigation is conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman. We hold that it is and we affirm.
The appellant was convicted of violating a regulation (three specifications) and conduct unbecoming an officer (two specifications) in violation of Articles 92 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 933.1 He was sentenced to be dismissed from the service and to forfeit $500.00 per month for 10 months. The convening…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. AronsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. GomesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. NorvellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. HiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. SheehanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.