Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheehan

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 16, 1983No. CM 442324PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of unauthorized absence, dereliction of duty, and making a false official statement and of three specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer (identical to the allegations of the substantive offenses), in violation of Articles 86, 92, 107 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892, 907 and 933 (1976) (hereinafter UCMJ), respectively. The trial judge held that the Article 133 offenses and the respective substantive offenses were multiplicious for sentencing purposes. The adjudged sentence of dismissal and total forfeitures…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. TimberlakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. DallmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. CzekalaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. CourtU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API