Bailey v. . Hayman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The action of the court in taxing the costs to he paid proportionately by the several parties to this action must he held for error.
O. S., 1241, reads, in part: “Costs shall he allowed of course to the plaintiff, upon a recovery . . . (1) In an action for the recovery of real property, or when a claim of title to real property arises on the pleadings, or is certified by the court to have come in question at the trial.” C. S., 1244 (7), provides that all costs and expenses incurred in special proceedings for the division and sale of either real or personal property under the chapter entitled…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Alexander v. . GibbonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Wilson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . CalcuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Huneycutt v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jernigan v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Wyatt v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Murphy v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Fosburgh v. RonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Ward v. CruseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.