Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fosburgh v. Ronald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1946No. 29972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This cause involves a question concerning the taxation of costs in this court. In an action entitled Fosburgh v. Sando and wife, brought in the superior court of King County, the plaintiff recovered a judgment on the 21st day of July, 1945. The Sandos filed notice of appeal and perfected it by filing a cost bond in the amount of two hundred dollars. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff began proceedings to enforce his judgment, whereupon they petitioned this court to permit them to supersede. This petition was granted by an order entered September 27, 1945, the matter, however, being referred to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fosburgh v. SandoWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bailey v. . HaymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Van Nostern v. Richey & Gilbert Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Deveny v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Lemon v. CoffinWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Thompson v. LennoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Thompson v. LennoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API