Murphy v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
’WiNBORNE, J.
After careful consideration of tbe several assignments of error presented by appellants, tbe petitioners, on this appeal, error is-not made to appear.
Tbe first seven assignments of error are based upon exceptions to tbe failure of tbe referee to find certain facts. Such failure is not ground for exception. Hence they are untenable. Tbe failure to find certain facts might be ground for a motion to recommit the report with instructions to find them, if it appeared that they were material. Tilley v. Bivens, 110 N.C. 343, 14 S.E. 920; Blalock v. Mfg. Co., 110 N.C. 99, 14 S.E. 501;…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Beard v. Sovereign Lodge of Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Blalock v. Kernersville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- White v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Lockleair v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.