Legal Opinion
State Bank v. Magraw, Kerfoot & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1924No. 23,869PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is from the judgment entered upon the order dismissing the case when plaintiff rested.
The complaint declares on two counts, one for money had and received, and one for conversion of a $5,000 draft belonging to plaintiff. The answer is practically a general denial.
*154A. H. Turrittin, plaintiff’s president, lived in Minneapolis, and had been or was, at the time of the transaction here in question, president of the Lincoln Bank in that city. Fred W. Hales was plaintiff’s cashier in active charge of its business at Westport. These two men, and Turrittin’s father-in-law, I. W. Bouck of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Gibson v. GoldthwaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farmington State Bank v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Barke v. Comstock State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Ertz v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1933