Legal Opinion

Ertz v. Murray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

For some time prior to September 17, 1927, The Bank of Freewater was actively engaged in business at Freewater, Umatilla county, Oregon. Two notes held by said bank had been disapproved by the bank examiner; and, to afford approved assets for said bank in lieu of those two notes, the defendants executed the note in suit, which is a joint and several note, dated September 17, 1927, to become due six months thereafter in the sum of $539 bearing interest at 8 per cent from date.

In Ms amended complaint, plaintiff alleges the execution and delivery of said note; and further alleges:

“That…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. State ex rel. Carroll v. Corning Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. McDaniel v. Altoona State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Schwehm v. Chelten Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. State Bank v. Magraw, Kerfoot & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API