Legal Opinion

Farmington State Bank v. Delaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1926No. 25,246PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Two actions brought by plaintiff against the Liberty State Bank of St. Paul, et al., were tried together. The court directed a verdict in each case in favor of the plaintiff. From orders denying separate motions for new trials, defendant Liberty State Bank appealed.

Respondent contends that in May, 1921, it purchased from appellant a series of 10 promissory notes of $120 each dated May 14, 1921, signed by George W. Delaney and indorsed by O. F. Cole Company and the appellant bank, for which it paid appellant $1,200. It further contends that in August of the same year it purchased from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. National City Bank v. Zimmer Vacuum Renovator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. First National Bank v. Pacific Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. State Bank v. Magraw, Kerfoot & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leahy v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. MellumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Barke v. Comstock State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Salem Trust Co. v. Federal Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API