Legal Opinion

Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1910No. Nos. 16,150—(7)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,-246.88, the total amount of twenty-two checks which were drawn on defendant to the order of the Dispatch Printing Company and were paid by defendant.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $3,-246.88, the total amount of twenty-two checks which were drawn on defendant to the order of the Dispatch Printing Company and were paid by defendant. The complaint alleged that M. A. Sturm was a solicitor of advertising for plaintiff; that the drawer of each check made it payable to the plaintiff and delivered it to Sturm to be delivered to plaintiff; that Sturm wrongfully and without any authority so to do indorsed it as follows: “The Dispatch Ptg. Co.” “St. Paul Dispatch, Minneapolis Dept., M. A. Sturm, Mgr.” “Pay to the order…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff, Dispatch Printing Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, doing business at St. Paul and publisher of the St. Paul Dispatch. In 1901 it employed one Sturm and placed him in charge of its advertising department at Minneapolis, with authority to solicit advertising from the merchants of that city and to collect and remit to plaintiff all accounts due therefor. He was paid for his services a commission of fifteen per cent, of all amounts received for advertising secured by him. From the date of his employment in 1901 until 1906, when he died, he made his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. New York Iron Mine v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Reifsnyder v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Hamlin's Wizard Oil Co. v. United States Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. McFadden v. FollrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API