Legal Opinion

Barke v. Comstock State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1928No. 26,623PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from a judgment.

In the spring of 1920 plaintiff sent to defendant, of which her brother Eugene Askegaard was cashier, $1,250 to invest for her. Defendant then held a $1,300 note against one Erickson. The bank records show this note was paid on April 19, 1920. The accrued interest was $97.50. It is conceded that the note was paid by one note for $147.50 which the bank retained and by another note for $1,250 which was the amount of plaintiff’s money. The larger note remained in the possession of the bank and was renewed on October 27, 1921, in the sum of $1,300 including $50…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Crookston State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Farmington State Bank v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. State Bank v. Magraw, Kerfoot & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Halla v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API