Legal Opinion

Floyd v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 12, 2013No. Nos. 08 Civ. 1034 SAS, 12 Civ. 2274 SASPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

In an Opinion issued today I found the City of New York liable in the Floyd case for violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the plaintiff class because of the way the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) has conducted stops and frisks over the past decade (the “Liability Opinion”). In an Opinion issued in January 2013, I found that the Ligón plaintiffs, representing a putative class of people stopped outside buildings participating in the Trespass Affidavit Program (“TAP”) in the Bronx, were entitled to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Manuel Ortega Melendres v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Floyd v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Ligon ex rel. J.G. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Ligon v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API