Legal Opinion

Floyd v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 31, 2014No. 13-3088-cv, 13-3123-cv, 14-2829-cv, 14-2848-cv, 14-2834-cvPublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Per curiam

These appeals present the important question of whether public-sector unions may intervene into a litigation where the actual parties to that litigation, including a newly-elected mayoral administration, have agreed -to a settlement. The intervenors in this case, a group of police unions, endeavored to challenge the ruling of United States District Judge Shira Scheindlin that the City of New York’s (“City”) “stop- and-frisk” policy was carried out in a discriminatory manner, as well as her imposition of various reforms to that policy. We previously ordered these cases to be reassigned from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. In re City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Laroe Estates, Inc. v. Town of ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API