Floyd v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
These appeals present the important question of whether public-sector unions may intervene into a litigation where the actual parties to that litigation, including a newly-elected mayoral administration, have agreed -to a settlement. The intervenors in this case, a group of police unions, endeavored to challenge the ruling of United States District Judge Shira Scheindlin that the City of New York’s (“City”) “stop- and-frisk” policy was carried out in a discriminatory manner, as well as her imposition of various reforms to that policy. We previously ordered these cases to be reassigned from…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Laroe Estates, Inc. v. Town of ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.