Legal Opinion

Manuel Ortega Melendres v. Joseph Arpaio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2015No. 13-16285, 13-17238PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

In a previous opinion in this case, we affirmed the district court’s post-trial preliminary injunction against Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office (individually, Sheriff Arpaio and MCSO; collectively, Defendants), which prohibited Defendants from detaining any individual “based only on knowledge or reasonable belief, without more, that the person is unlawfully present within the United States.” See Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990, 994 (9th Cir.2012) (Melendres I). In this opinion, we address Defendants’ appeal from the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. B.K. v. Thomas BetlachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. Sergio Ramirez v. Transunion LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API