Legal Opinion
Seminole Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2002No. Civ.A. 02-0730(RBW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The current lawsuit is but one chapter in the ongoing saga between the plaintiff, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma (“the Nation”) 1 and the defendants, the Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (“DOI” or “Department”) and its officials. Currently, plaintiff seeks a declaration from this Court that the DOI has acted in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (2000) (“APA”) and the “Principal Chief’ Act of October 22, 1970, (“Act of 1970”), Pub.L. 91-495, 84 Stat. 1091, by refusing to recognize the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- California Valley Miwok Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Cherokee Nation v. NashDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- General Electric Co. v. Department of Air ForceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Vann v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- California Valley Miwok Tribe v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.