California Valley Miwok Tribe v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge.
Since the days of John Marshall, it has been a bedrock principle of federal Indian law that every tribe is “capable of managing its own affairs and governing itself.” Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1, 16, 8 L.Ed. 25 (1831); see also Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515, 559, 8 L.Ed. 483 (1832) (stating that tribes are “distinct, independent political communities, retaining their' original natural rights”). But tribes that want federal benefits must adhere to federal requirements. The gateway to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Ralls Corp. v. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Cayuga Nation v. TannerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Mackinac Tribe v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Brackeen v. HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.