Legal Opinion

Conley v. Henderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

The plaintiff, James L. Conley, brought this suit against S. E. Henderson and others, seeking to have two deeds, absolute in form, declared to be a mortgage. In and by one of said deeds, Conley and wife had conveyed to S. E. Henderson 920 acres of tim berland in Douglas county, Oregon. In and by the other deed, under Conley’s direction, the Wallingwood Company, a corporation the stock of which was owned by Conley, had conveyed to Henderson the west 54 feet ■of lot 10, block 271, Couch Addition to the city of Portland, together with an apartment house thereon known as the Teshner Manor. Both…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flagg v. MannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
  2. Austin v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Backus v. WestOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Montesano Lum. & Mfg. Co. v. Portland Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Carter v. Simpson Estate Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harper v. Interstate Brewery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Murray v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Umpqua Forest Industries v. Neenah-Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API